Antony vs. Brutus The funeral speeches presented in the play Julius Caesar are very important to the plot. Even though Brutus gained the support of the Romans, it was not for long. In the end Mark Antony’s speech comes out more effective than Brutus’s as he is able to turn the Romans against Brutus and the conspirators. In one sentence, express the purpose of Brutus’ speech and his principal means of achieving it. Brutus gives a reasoned prose speech that convinces the crowd Caesar had to die. Brutus and Antony's speach by Eric Flach Antony uses paralepsis in his speech when he brings up the will of Caesar. Or did you not only not read this play. Brutus has betrayed Caesar for his love for Rome. Brutus’s speech was very effective in persuading the audience, because by the end every man that heard it was saying “Live! Near the end of his speech, Antony breaks down because his heart “is in the coffin there” with Caesar, and must pause “till it comes back” to him. Don't waste time. Share. Show More. This device is used in the line that says “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Brutus said that they had to kill Caesar because he was ambitious. Brutus effectively persuades the crowd to support his cause, but fails to reach the crowd as personally as Antony because he speaks superiorly to the crowd rather than a peer, as Antony does. February 2013 Speech Analysis The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience that they are given to, but rhetorical devices were used in different ways in order … By analyzing the speeches and figuring out which one is more effective, the reader knows how to feel about the subject and who to trust. Antony is very smart and uses his brain frequently during the play and Brutus is very naive about many of things. Article last reviewed: 2019 | St. Rosemary Institution © 2010-2020 | Creative Commons 4.0. He uses a number of persuasive techniques. Turning the Tide: Brutus vs. Antony Re-reading each of these speeches from Act 3, answer the following prompt questions, providing specific, textual evidence ( plus line #) for support. In order to accomplish all his objectives Antony used in his speech a combination of verbal irony, repetition, connotation, and imagery rhetorical devices while strongly appealing to the plebeians “pathos” emotions. For example, Antony used Lepidus to seek revenge on all of the conspirators to take the blame for their deaths. If any speak; for him I have offended. Through this analysis we are also able to realize why Brutus’s speech becomes one of his justifications and explanations, while Antony’s becomes one of manipulation and skill. Jump to Page . to imply that Caesar was not ambitious at all. Cite this article as: William Anderson (Schoolworkhelper Editorial Team), "Julius Caesar: Brutus and Mark Antony Comparison," in. Brutus is clearly overmatched at Caesar's funeral, both by Antony's duplicity and oration. Your online site for school work help and homework help. Rhetorical Devices: Brutus’ Speech Antony’s Speech What is the context of the speech? Hire a Professional to Get Your 100% Plagiarism Free Paper. He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. 3. Download Now. For example, Antony was manipulative in his emotional approach to persuade people to become outraged at Brutus. Anthony's Speech: 5. Then, for reasons that remain questionable even taking naiveté into account, Brutus not only yields to Antony … It only takes seconds! Here's the first irony of Antony's speech, in that he is unequivocally here to praise Caesar. Brutus’s speech was very effective in persuading the audience, because by the end every man that heard it was saying “Live! Mark Antony used rhetorical questions multiple times, just as Brutus had; but his rhetorical questions were disproving the reason for the death of Caesar. ” The repetition of this phrase soon becomes a sort of subtle derogatory statement towards Brutus and the other conspirators, bringing down the credibility of Brutus’s speech and … The Persuasive techniques in Brutus’ speech In his speech at the funeral of Caesar in Act 3, Sc 2, Brutus gives the public his reason for killing Caesar. Brutus Beginning with Brutus’ speech on page, 910—line 11: Part of Brutus’ speech is organized in a cause and effect manner. Both men present different points about Casaer and hisrule in Rome. Antony follows with a line of straight iambic pentameter punctuated with a feminine ending. On the right hand side of the page is an explanation of the techniques used. The First section will contextualise the extracts used for analysis, and compare Brutus’s pedestrian speech with Mark Antony’s impressive oratory. You are on page 1 of 9. In the speech of Antony he addresses the people of Rome. Antony calls the Romans his friends. (when/where/why) Analysis of persuasive techniques: Your job is to identify at least one example of one of Aristotle’s three modes of persuasion. Are You on a Short Deadline? In the speech examples of each technique are underlined. Mark Antony wanted justice for Caesar who made him passionate and sincere in his speech. Brutus appears to be naive throughout the whole play because he believed everyone was as honorable as he. first of all Brutus was manipulated by Cassius thinking it was for the good of Rome … and he does say he killed him for ambition… but you see only Brutus thinks that… but Cassius has a very own selfish reason and he is using Brutus because the people can trust him!! Brutus just wanted power so he didn’t really have a passion in his speech. Having said that, Antony was a man of his senses, and an emotional one at that – who had been surprised and disturbed by the killing of JC for which he was not party of. Antony’s intelligence was very apparent throughout the play and Brutus appeared to be naive about many things. Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, rhetorical devices are commonly used to persuade the audience. Science, English, History, Civics, Art, Business, Law, Geography, all free! At the battlefield at Philippi, Antony and Octavius ready themselves for battle against the forces of Brutus and Cassius. I’m not blaming you or challenging you I’m just correcting you … please don’t get this the wrong way!!! ” This was effective because the use of this line makes it seem as if Brutus was so noble that he would sacrifice something he loved dearly for the sake of Rome. During the speeches many devices were effectively used to convince the Romans to choose the side of the argument being presented. She’s not wrong. Search inside document . Mark Antony used questions like “You all did see on the Lupercal, that I presented him thrice a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? Because of this, Antony was able to sway the crowd to his side, against Brutus … ” and saying that Brutus shall become a better Caesar. Antony prised Caesar and was his right hand in battle and a close friend, that Antony truly loved Caesar. ” He also uses the rhetorical device antithesis, which is the oppostition of ideas in a balanced construction. Active Themes As Antony ascends the pulpit, the plebeians talk among themselves, saying that Antony had better not speak ill of Brutus , and that Rome is blessed to be rid of Caesar . Mark Antony’s speech followed Brutus’s, so Mark Antony had to seem like he was helping out Brutus’s point. Brutus did not question what he was told, assuming it was always true. He expresses to everyone the reasons and times, “as he was ambitious”(300). Antony is, in fact, lying. Antony is smart in the way that he manipulates people to his own advantage. Print. In Mark Antony’s speech, he sways them to believe that Caesar did not deserve to die, and that the conpirators were the real enemies by using rhetorical devices like rhetorical question and apostrophe. The reaction to Mark Antony’s speech was more than that of Brutus’s. he does it to add interest in his speech. Throughout his speech he frequently addresses Brutus and his fellow conspirators to be “honorable men. I have read this story 6 times and as an English teacher what Elizabeth is saying is incorrect, Dear Elizabeth … you are wrong ! Brutus And Antony Speech Analysis 1328 Words | 6 Pages. This is a calculated tactic to disarm a crowd firmly on the side of Brutus when Antony takes the pulpit. Brutus was a introverted philosopher, he was INCREDIBLY intelligent. Antony had better use of emotional appeals, loaded words, and tone. The strongest contrast between the two characters appears to be their ability and inability to be both honorable and persuasive. This analysis is profoundly wrong on the piece. He started with what seemed to be agreeing with Brutus but turned into a speech against the conpirators. when he said that he will not read the will it makes the conspirators want to know what the will says even more Paralepsis In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between two of the characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. It is known that both Brutus and Antony desired to appeal to the common people. Let a Professional Writer Help You, © New York Essays 2020. This will be … Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong. He defends the noble Brutus. Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? Shakespeare does pit Mark Antony’s speech against Brutus’ speech. When Brutus spoke at Caesar’s funeral, he appealed to the people’s logic and Antony spoke to the emotions of the people. “Not that I love’d Caesar less, but that I love’d Rome more” (III.ii.21-22 in Brutus’s speech to the crowd of citizens). 6. Thou art fled to brutish beasts, and men have lost their reason” to emphesize that the Romans were foolish to listen to Brutus’s reasoning as to why the conspirators killed Caesar. In the speech at Caesar’s funeral Brutus spoke to the people’s logical mind and Antony spoke to the emotions of the people. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the … Brutus and Antony both produce different tactics to sway the peoplesopinions about Caesar. Brutus and Antony are two very different character types. Professional writers in all subject areas are available and will meet your assignment deadline. Live Brutus! Brutus uses antithesis and parallelism. Jessica Helm Phillips English 10 Pre-AP 1st 28 February 2013 Speech Analysis The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience that they are given to, but rhetorical devices were used in different ways in order for each to have an effect on the people of Rome. Brutus attempts to sway the people through logic, in a highly emotional time for Rome showing his inability to connect with the people, or even see them – because he only thinks robotically – you seem… Read more », I must agree with Victoria! Before Antony spoke, had Brutus effectively achieved his purpose? From this, the crowd’s reaction to Brutus’s speech is remarkably positive, with some citizens even suggesting that Brutus … Why is the combination of these two devices effective? ATTENTION: Please help us feed and educate children by uploading your old homework! After Cesar’s assassination Rome was in a state of panic. ” and “When the poor have wept, Caesar hath cried: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? hes honorable in the sense he killing for the people that least thats how the story was i thought the same thing at first killing a friend honorable thats weird but its for the people, although im only in high school, this helped me very much. Brutus, who killed Cesar, tries to explain to the audience why he did such a thing, and Antony explains why what Brutus did was wrong. Retrieved October 9, 2020, from https://newyorkessays.com/essay-brutus-and-mark-antony-speech-comparison/, Save Time On Research and Writing. HIRE verified writer $35.80 for a 2-page paper. Brutus basis for his speech is presenting an explanation of whyhe planned and participated in Caesars execution. Let us do your homework! Antony was persuasive in the way that he used people to get whatever he wanted. All rights reserved, Brutus and Mark Antony Speech Comparison. This essay will be divided into two sections to explore the ways in which Antony is depicted as better leader. Mark Antony also uses apostrophe, or the turn from an audience to a specific person that is either absent or present, real or imaginary. Live Brutus! Was this serious? What is written here is not true.Brutus killed a powerful leader for no reason (he says that he was ambitious but he has no proofs for what he said) and still he can be honorable man ? ” and saying that Brutus shall become a better Caesar. In conclusion, in William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between the two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. She just has a different opinion is all. Brutus was very honorable and Antony was very persuasive. A Flair for the Dramatic/Selfish Machines by Pierce the Veil. Get a verified writer to help you with Critical Analysis of Mark Antony’s Funeral Speech. Brutus’s speech during Caesar’s funeral was one that would temporarily protect himself and the conspirators from the wrath of the Romans after he murdered their beloved leader. Free proofreading and copy-editing included. Scene 1. comparing the two is a very big point in the essay i have to write. Logos Epimone "Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses that you may be the better judge." Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar was more effective than Brutus’ because Antony used a multifaceted emotional argument, instead of relying on one assertion, as Brutus had. One of the most important and significant parts in the play is the funeral speech given by both Brutus and Mark Antony. Marc Antony’s speech is filled with rhetorical devices to avenge Caesar and to convince the crowd that he was right and Brutus was wrong. ” Brutus is an honorable man”(300), so if he tells of Caesar being ambitious then you all should believe him. Brutus vs. Antony Essay 673 Words | 3 Pages. Although Brutus was a good orator and uses rhetoric well, Antony had the more persuasive speech overall. However, the way in which each man went about it differs drastically. The citizen’s began to rally together to take down the conpirators, and vowed to kill every last one of them. I would use this for my essay, but the start of this essay is similar to my teacher’s example. He used rhetorical questions often throughout his speech asking questions like “Had you rather Caesar living and all die slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? 4. "Julius Caesar" Brutus and Mark Antony Speech Comparison Essay 597 Words | 3 Pages. Although Brutus’s speech was very influential, the speech Mark Antony gave had a quite bigger impact. Although Brutus’s speech was very influential, the speech Mark Antony gave had a quite bigger impact. For example, Brutus spoke in a detached way about Caesar’s death while Antony spoke to the emotions of the crowd by crying and talking about all the good things that Caesar did for Rome. The rhetorical device Antony took hold of and made the central device throughout his persuasive argument was verbal irony. Brutus was very honorable in the way that he always told people the truth. The conspiracy killed Caesar as their goal to protect Rome from dictatorship, ironically it was the opposite of what the conspirators have hoped to achieve. No sir, he is not honorable. February 2013 Speech Analysis The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience that they are given to, but rhetorical devices were used in different ways in order for each to have an effect on the people of Rome. The speeches given by both Brutus and Mark Antony in William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar are very persuasive to the audience that they are given to, but rhetorical devices were used in different ways in order for each to have an effect on the people of Rome. https://schoolworkhelper.net/julius-caesar-brutus-and-mark-antony-comparison/, Laertes’ Role & Importance in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, “On the Sidewalk, Bleeding”: Analysis & Theme, “Mid Term Break”: Poem Analysis & Summary, Hiro Murai’s “Guava Island”: Film Analysis, Alice Dunbar Nelson: Poet, Essayist and Activist, Impact of Globalization- Gini Coefficient, Themes in William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 19. It is certainly appropriate to use quotations from the speech to support your points. Antony arrives, and Brutus asks the crowd to hear him speak. (Julius Caesar.III.ii) Ethos Antony's Speech "Who is here so base that would be a bondman? Mark Antony’s speech ended up being more effective than Brutus’s due to his use of pathos throughout to help his point be made that Caesar did not deserve to die. Brutus was very honorable and Antony was very persuasive. When Brutus spoke at Caesar’s funeral, he appealed to the people’s logic and Antony spoke to the emotions of the people. Both speeches were very effective in getting the point across by using all three forms of persuasive appeals: Ethos, Pathos and Logos. Science Teacher and Lover of Essays. Analysis of the Funeral Speeches of Brutus and Marc Antony from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar At the funeral of Julius Caesar two characters make speeches to the plebeian mob, Brutus and Marc Antony. Two speeches were given to the people of Rome. It is used in the line “O judgement! Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar was more effective than Brutus’ because Antony used a multifaceted emotional argument, instead of relying on one assertion, as Brutus had. Brutus And Antony Speech Analysis 1328 Words | 6 Pages. (2016, Sep 21). Brutus’ speech and mark Antony’s, about the death of Caesar and it’s reasoning. Finally, Brutus’s arrogance is apparent in that he takes for granted that Antony’s speech will post no threat to him. In Brutus’s speech, he uses devices such as rhetorical question and antithesis to convince the Romans that he and the conpirators did a good deed by killing Caesar. Shakespeare shows us the personalities of the two orators and gives one an advantage over the other. In William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, there is a major difference between two of the characters, Brutus and Mark Antony. Antony And Brutus Speech Analysis. If 1012 Words 5 Pages. Brutus was very honorable and Antony was very persuasive. His speech has a lot of flaws and no proofs at all. but Brutus is naive … he should have seen right through Cassius…. 7 7 upvotes, Mark this document as useful 1 1 downvote, Mark this document as not useful Embed. Because of this, Antony was able to sway the crowd to his side, against Brutus and the Conspirators. save Save Brutus vs. Antony Speech Analysis For Later. Due to this, Brutus’s most useful weapon is his honesty. Tutor and Freelance Writer. How about receiving a customized one? Find at least one example of each. Brutus’ speech was very short and to the point and spoke to the logic of the people in the crowd. Brutus and Antony Speech Analysis and Comparison After the assassination of Julius Caesar, his comrades Brutus and Antony both made speeches to the Roman people addressing his death.

Weighing Scale 50kg Capacity, Red Cross Practice Test, Medical Diploma Courses In Karachi After Matric, Agriculture Colleges In Texas, Mosby's Essentials For Nursing Assistants, 9th Edition, Where To Buy Henna Powder In Toronto, Decatur City Schools Reopening, Gas Wall Ovens For Sale, Mission Tx To Harlingen Tx, Types Of Health Research, Sony A7riv Price,